Archive

Archive for May, 2009

Trick Progression Video with Aaron Hadlow

Thursday, May 21st, 2009

img_0239On monday we got the call from Aaron to say he was back in Worthing and did we want to come film him. Hard to turn down any opportunity to film with the 5x World Champ!

Short on kit (due to the Fat Sand team being away in Canne) we pulled together some cameras and tripods, and myself and Will jumped in the van and headed down to Lancing to catch the end of low tide.

We were greeted by the ever enthusiastic Lewis Crathern and partner in crime Neal Hilder – Aaron’s buddies, Worthing heroes and UK champions. 7m’s were pumped, the sun was shining, waves were rolling in and everything was set for a perfect south coast session.

Our aim was to catch Aaron performing some of his newest tricks – heavily wakeboard inspired and taking advantage of the natural kickers, we were treated to the superspeedwhiptastic nuclear grabbed bel airs to blind and crow mobes which are motivating Aaron to go ride these days. He’s not landing these perfectly… yet… but its a great indication of where Aaron is heading with his riding.

So check out our video – including the tricks, the crashes and some personal commentary from Aaron himself on his Progression.

You need to a flashplayer enabled browser to view this YouTube video

Progression Production Tips – Part 3 : Encoding and Distribution

Tuesday, May 19th, 2009

Here’s the third and final part of our Progression Production Tips. If you have read the previous parts then check them out:

So you’ve filmed your mates, spent every evening for a month editing all the footage down into a snappy 5 minute video and then all to often it ends up on YouTube looking blocky or blurry. This post is how to get it out to the masses, looking as good as it did on your computer plus we’ll look at the various websites where you can host your videos and all the features they offer.

So we’ll do this in reverse, we’ll look at the hosting of your video first as this impact how you encode your video…

Distribution:

hd-logoMost people are going to look to put their video out on the internet for anyone and everyone to view and the free hosting options available are endless. Sorry to be boring but at the moment the obvious choice is the best, you can’t really go wrong with YouTube! In the past the cool kids all used Vimeo, as they offered High Definition (HD) playback of video and their site was clean and simply. But YouTube has caught up now and offer the same HD playback, and if you encode your video and upload it correctly you’ll get amazing quality*. Also with YouTube you’ll get the most passing traffic and playback through other sources – iPhones, Apple TVs etc along with easy embedding into other websites/forums etc.

We put all our free Progression video out on YouTube and have had great results.

Other options:

Facebook – great way to get your videos out to just your friends, though you can easily embed YouTube videos into your Facebook stream. Their HD video is great quality too. Example

KiteForum.tv – A YouTube of sorts for kiters, upload your videos and get them out to 1000′s of kiters. We put all our videos up on it but find it easier to just embed our YouTube uploaded videos on the site – saves uploading to both sites and you still get to see all your stats on the YouTube site (you don’t get any of that with KiteForum.tv). Only issues is that KiteForum.tv doesn’t show the HD version of a video but people can click through to YouTube to get that higher quality version. Example (Note to Toby – let us embed the HD version ;-)

Flickr – If you are into your photos too then Flickr can be a good option for shorter videos (90 secs or less). Example

Blip.tv – A good way of having multiple videos in a playlist, and embed that playlist into your own site. It has several other good pro features and is something we used with several of our Production clients. Example

Encoding

If you’re uploading to any of these services then you need to export/encode your final video into a single video file that can be uploaded to your hosting service. There used to be alot of restrictions on this in the past but these days you can upload in pretty much any format BUT generally there is one codec that will suit you best – H.264. This is becoming the unofficial standard for internet video at higher qualities, and any modern editing program will have options to export in this codec.

Lets clear up a quick area that confuses many people – Containers and Codecs. Any video file will have a single container into which there can be multiple video and audio streams, and those streams are encoding in various codecs. Most of the time you’ll have a container with a single video and audio stream.Eg.

  • Quicktime (Container), Sorensen Spark (Video Codec), Mp3 (Audio Codec)
  • Windows Media Video (Container), WMV 9 (Video Codec), WMA 9 (Audio Codec)
  • MP4 (Video codec), H.264 (Video Codec), AAC (Audio Codec).

Resolution, Fields & Frame rates:

The size of the video has become simpler now we have HD video. For Standard Definition video (HD) it was a bit more complicated because the resolution for PAL and NTSC video was different, 720×576 (PAL) or 720×480 (NTSC). With HD video we have the same resolutions for PAL or NTSC and you’ll find that the two main HD sizes are 1280×720 or 1920×1080.

Mixed in with this we have interlaced or progressive video. Interlaced is where each frame records only the odd or even lines and then they are mixed together into a single frame. This would be specified as 50i (50 frames interlaced, which ends up at 25 full frames a second) or 60i. Progressive is where each frame contains all the lines at that particular instant, this is expressed as 25p, 30p or 24p. Why do we have these two types? Interlaced comes from TV where it was a technical necessity for broadcast. Progressive has its roots in film but also for internet video, progressive is the normal. This becomes important when we export our final video, to ensure we get a de-interlaced progressive video file that will display correctly online – have you seen this before with footage:

Interlaced (right) & Progressive (left)

The frame grab on the right is interlaced, whilst on the right its been made progression. Click the image to a large version and you’ll see the different easily.

And as we have touched on above, there are different frame rates – the number of images or frames that make up one second of video. Generally we there are 3 main frames:

  • 25 fps – The standard in PAL video, used in the UK, Europe, Oz and Africa.
  • 30 fps – The standard in NTSC video, used in the US, South America and Japan**
  • 24 fps – The standard for films for broadcast at the cinema.

All the major video hosting sites will deal with any of the frame rates, but it maybe worth checking if you are having problems getting good quality on other video sites, if they have limitations on this.

OK, so with all the background overview of containers, codecs, resolutions, fields and frame rates we can get on to exporting our video.

Finally lets encode…

compressor-appletv-presetSo if you are going with the h.264 codec, then its best to use the mp4 container and aac audio codec. For windows users, you might find it simpler using Windows Media Video, as its Microsoft’s own format, but there is little that I can suggest on this. For Mac fans, you can make life easy by using the standard AppleTV preset that most video software on Mac offers – its truly exceptional quality output. But whatever you use the defaults below are what you want to stick too:

Size: I recommend that you export at a size of  what most people would say is 720p – 1280 x 720 progressive, and this can be any of the frames rates we listed above, just use the one your camera shoots in.***

Data Rate: Then you need to consider your data rate. You want it as large as possible, so that when the video site re-encodes your video for display on their site, you lose the least amount of quality. I think a data rate of 2500 kbps will suffice for most people, but anything up to 5000 kbps will work well.

Fields: Most consumer video programs should handle interlaced video well enough that their default exporting options will sort out any of the field, black line and ghosting issues that we discussed early. If you find that you are having problems you might want to look for some setting for “Field Dominance” on the problematic clips or sequence. It can be a tricky one to sort out and the solution is unique to each program.

Audio: Finally you have to pick your sound options, I generally go with 96kbps or 128kbps and have never had any issues with this.

So once you have it all setup correctly, click the submit/export button and sit back and wait. and wait. and wait ;-) Well this kind of depends on how powerful your machine is but encode to h.264 can be pretty slow but that is what it takes to get great compression.

youtube-upload

Finally login into your YouTube account (or video host of choice) and get uploading!!

——————

I hope that this series of post has been helpful to you all and please feel free to ask any question in the comments or drop us an email if you have any further questions, something to add or disagree adamantly with me!

* Sites like YouTube don’t just take your uploaded video, re-encode it for display and then throw away your original. They hang on it and re-encode the different versions of the your video as and when they think it will give a better result – so uploading in the best quality possible makes a different both now and in the future.

** Actually NTSC is not 30 fps but 29.97 fps – a small but important difference. 59.94 MHz is the frequency of power in the US, compared to 50 MHz in the UK/Europe, this is where the frames rates were derived from (50 MHz => 50i => which is common just called 25 frames per second)

*** You might be interested to know that the short hand for resolution/fields/frame rate is lineheight|field|framerate eg. 720p25 or 1080i60


Mobile videos update

Thursday, May 14th, 2009

backloop_mobile_stillAfter a long winter hiatus, we slowly getting the Progression Mobile videos back on track.

They’ve been hugely popular and we hope that they are giving everyone a little extra nudge to go out and try something new, as the summer arrives for all of us in the Southern Hemisphere.

We now have over 25 Mobile videos covering tricks and techniques from Beginners to Experts. The latest additions are the the carving heelside to toeside turn, some help with your stance, basic jumps, the backloop transition and front loop transitions, all of which are key for any inspiring intermediate.

The most popular video so far? The Waterstart, of course, probably the most defining moment of any kitesurfers progression.

For the more experienced, its no surprise that Kiteloop Top Tips is a real hit, along with the unhooked S-bend.

And for all those aspiring Pro riders, you seem to be getting your fill on the Front Mobe and Back to Wrapped – both classic unhooked powered freestyle tricks.

Anyway, expect more to come over the next few weeks and let us know what top tips you want to see get made next…

The Progression Team is growing

Sunday, May 10th, 2009

The Prog TeamWell I’m pleased to announce a new formal addition to the Progression Team – Fiona Grantham. Yes, thats right we have our first female member of staff! Now I said formal above because Fi has been involved with Progression & Fat Sand for the past 2 years because she is sleeping with the boss (me!), and as a marketer by trade her strategic insight has been invaluable as the company continues to grow and evolve.  Fiona has of course got a personal interest in the sport too, after a few years under my – and progressions – superb guidance she is now half way through the intermediate DVD.  She loves kite surfing almost as much as me and i think her experience, knowledge and unique perspective will help us make Progression even better for even more people trying to get the most out of this sport.

She will join Matt Coyne who is both an old and new member of the team too – new as he joined us again in Jan this year and old as he was part of the team who help us set up shop back in 2006!  Back then Matt helped us set up the sales network and build valuable partnership and sponsorship deals.  He continues in that vein as well as working with Fi on the strategic marketing and development of the Progression product & brand – i fear they will make a great team and make a lot of work for the poor old boss :-(

With more of us on board I’m really excited about developing some new products, events and initiatives that I hope will make Progression an even more useful part of your own kiting development.  So a big welcome to them both and here’s to a productive 2009 for us all!

First Impressions: North Rhino 09 16m

Friday, May 8th, 2009

North Rhino 09 16m Kite in skyJust to be clear, reviewing kites isn’t really Progression’s thing but my brother had been over from the States and was looking to get some new North kites. He lives in the San Franciscso area, which has predonimantly light winds, so we started some research to find out what would be the best light winds kites for him in the North range. The new Rhino’s looked like the best option but being so new there was not that much information out there about them, hence why I’m now writing this post to share a little of what we found, and think about the kites, after the first session.

Background: My brother previously has North Rhino’s 20m, 14m & 10m, but from 2003 before 5th lines and anyone had mentioned bow or hybrid kites. The 20m North Rhino of yesterday year was the original lightwind machine that pulled like a truck and it was important to get something to replace that. (Me, I ride Naish Torch’s or North Rebels). We’re both tall and pretty heavy – 198cm & 100kg

Location: Felpham, small village on the South coast of England, which has some of the best sea breezes in the country!

Wind: Started at 12-13 knots Increased to 18 knots by the end of our session.

Kite: North Rhino 09 16m (others were on various 13′s, 10′s and 8.5′s once the wind had filled in)

Board: North Sky Pro – 138 x 42.5

Setup: I’m not gonna say much about the setup or build of the kite – its North, its the usually high quality and simple to setup straight out of the bag. Their Easy Pump seems to work well though my brother stuck to the recommend pressure of 6psi when pumping the kite but the problem there was that air  transfers from the leading edge to the struts quite slowly, so a few minute after turning the kite over the leading edge was a bit soft, dropping to 5psi. So ensure you allow the air pressure to balance between the bladders before finishing pumping.

The kite can fly with either a bridle in 4 line mode or with no bridle and in 5th line mode. We had it on a bridle/4 line  setup as this is supposed to give it better lightwind performance. On the bar front, its all great but personally the chicken loop strop was too long and needed to be adjusted, buts that easy to do.

Performance: Overall its a really enjoyable kite to fly. Its fast turning for a 16m and gives a very smooth source of power, absorbing gusts so they are un-noticable. At the lighter end even when you are having to work the kite a bit to keep the power constant you can cruise up wind and get some jumps. Speaking of which, it jumps really well. Nice high floaty jumps. The smoothness of the kite means its not easy to ‘feel’ exactly where kite is in the sky but the kite does response well to bar input, and flies fast enough to get you out of trouble if you get the kite in the wrong place.

I didn’t try any kiteloops (my back is pretty screwed at the moment) but downlooping on carving turns were really good and I reckon it will kiteloop pretty easily in 15 knots+, not that it will pull particularly hard through the loop.

In the strong winds it was massively controllable, in fact I was shocked to see others on 8.5m kites as I didn’t feel overpowered or out of control in anyway. I could have been on my 12m Torch easily. But the bridle of this style of kite really does soak up all the extra power and translate it into forward speed. So great for going fast.

Downsides: There are only two small issues, but really down to taste or riding style. The first is that the smoothness of the rider may not be as ‘exciting’ to some people, as the kite seems to have the same pull all the time, even in the gusts, so you don’t get that seat of your pants ride – probably a very a big selling point for many people!

The second issue is related to the same aspect of the kite, its very hard to pop off the water with this kite. What I mean by this, is leaving the kite low in the wind window, and ‘popping’ into the air by edging hard upwind to launch out of the water. The 16m doesn’t really allow this, you edge hard upwind and the kite just takes all the extra power. Maybe the smaller kites will be more pop-able but the 16m was not easy for this BUT this is not what this kite is about so its not really a negative just something to consider.

I’d be interesting to see how it compares to the biggest Rebel, same brand different style of kite.

Overall: I had a blast on this kite and would be keen to see how it performs in really marginal conditions (10 knots), but hopes are high!

I got my camera to film my brother and took a couple of shots of the kite flying for anyone wanting to see how it looks in the sky:

You need to a flashplayer enabled browser to view this YouTube video